Drupal Answers is a question and answer site for Drupal developers and administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've recently reused the source code from an old project - Anonymous Publishing that seems to have been abandoned around 2008 as a Drupal 5 development version. There has never been an official release of Anonymous Publishing

I'm interested in the functionality Anonymous Publishing offers for my some of my own Drupal 7 sites, and have started work to convert it to Drupal 7. The conversion project is currently in my sandbox. However, the entire idea for this module and about 80 % of the code in the sandbox is from the original author (Ronny López).

I plan to develop this to the point when it is fully debugged and tested, and ready to be placed under drupal.org/projects as an "official" contributed module.

I wonder: What is the "right" thing to (do according to protocol on Drupal.org)? I believe my options are:

  1. To request to become the official maintainer of the abandoned module, and to release my Drupal 7 port as a "continuation" of the abandoned module.

  2. To release my project as a "new" module, with just an acknowledgement pointing back to the previous project.

My question is: What is generally considered the correct thing to do in a case like this?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Request to become the new maintainer, and push your changes as the continuation of the old project.

That is the correct thing to do.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.