Timeline for Bypass comment validation for SOME anonymous users, based on the provided email address?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2015 at 8:26 | comment | added | s427 | @kiamlaluno : for me it was a suggestion more than a requirement ("a sort of internal white list"). The purpose of my question was to find a way to make validation easier (and improve user experience for frequent commenters) by auto-approving comments based on some rules. This module definitely does that, and in a way that is probably easier than having to manually fill and maintain a white list, so it's fine for me. (Was not aware that my question was a duplicate, sorry if it's the case.) | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 23:27 | comment | added | mpdonadio♦ | Instead of adding duplicate answers to multiple questions, please tailor to the answer for the question or flag as a duplicate. Thanks. | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 3:40 | comment | added | avpaderno♦ | The module doesn't have any setting to whitelist some email address; it has the setting to blacklist email addresses, which is the one set on Email addresses to never auto-approve. Wasn't this one of the requirements made from @s427? | |
| Jul 5, 2015 at 10:59 | comment | added | herci | I didn't use it with Mollom so couldn't confirm, unfortunately. | |
| Jul 5, 2015 at 9:02 | comment | added | s427 | Looks great. Can you confirm if it plays nice with Mollom? | |
| Jul 5, 2015 at 8:41 | vote | accept | s427 | ||
| Jul 4, 2015 at 22:24 | comment | added | s427 | Thanks, I'll have to try it out. That looks exactly like what I was looking for. | |
| Jul 4, 2015 at 19:22 | history | answered | herci | CC BY-SA 3.0 |