Timeline for What's a good balance between reusing fields versus creating new ones in the context of fields scalability?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 29, 2018 at 14:22 | answer | added | Oscar | timeline score: 0 | |
S Apr 6, 2015 at 7:19 | history | suggested | Pierre.Vriens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Rephrase question and remove some noise
|
Apr 6, 2015 at 6:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 6, 2015 at 7:19 | |||||
Mar 31, 2015 at 22:45 | answer | added | jozwikjp | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 14, 2014 at 14:19 | answer | added | Waterskier19 | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 13, 2014 at 14:26 | history | edited | avpaderno♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 30, 2013 at 11:40 | answer | added | purab | timeline score: -4 | |
Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 | answer | added | Andre Baumeier | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 10, 2011 at 23:32 | vote | accept | rafamd | ||
Dec 7, 2011 at 1:09 | answer | added | mpdonadio♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
Dec 7, 2011 at 0:36 | comment | added | rafamd | Think we've gathered very constructive and informative comments around this question. However, I'll wait one or two days before marking as answered, as something inside me insists that keeping that one or two most heavy fields separate (despite they could be reused) could be a good idea :) ...specially knowing those fileds could easily grow by 5, 10 or 20 million items per year. | |
Dec 4, 2011 at 21:28 | answer | added | BetaRide | timeline score: 13 | |
Dec 4, 2011 at 15:32 | answer | added | Berdir | timeline score: 25 | |
Dec 4, 2011 at 9:33 | answer | added | joevallender | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 4, 2011 at 2:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDrupal/status/143153682077319168 | ||
Dec 4, 2011 at 2:06 | comment | added | mpdonadio♦ | I would love to see answers backed up with actual metrics. | |
Dec 3, 2011 at 22:32 | history | edited | rafamd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2011 at 22:23 | history | asked | rafamd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |