Timeline for How to make the comment author name required for anonymous users?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 19:09 | vote | accept | Adrian Cid Almaguer | ||
| S Nov 21, 2016 at 17:16 | history | suggested | HomoTechsual | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting tweaks
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 21, 2016 at 17:16 | |||||
| S Nov 21, 2016 at 16:52 | history | suggested | HomoTechsual | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting tweaks
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 21, 2016 at 16:52 | |||||
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:50 | history | edited | Adrian Cid Almaguer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:50 | comment | added | HomoTechsual | As a note for this - I'm saying it's essentially redundant to check that the user is logged in as if they are logged in the required field is prefilled. With that said @AndrewNim's method is probably a more "Drupal" method of doing this. Plus a possibly-redundant if is preferrable to an error. | |
| S Nov 21, 2016 at 16:49 | history | edited | Adrian Cid Almaguer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 21, 2016 at 16:49 | |||||
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:44 | history | edited | Andrew Nim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 634 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:38 | comment | added | HomoTechsual | I'd argue that the if check is unnecessary - if the user is logged in the name field is prefilled anyway making the method proposed by Adrian marginally quicker. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:36 | history | edited | Adrian Cid Almaguer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:35 | history | answered | Andrew Nim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |