Timeline for Empty taxonomy pages
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 13, 2015 at 14:38 | answer | added | Alan Dixon | timeline score: 2 | |
S Nov 26, 2014 at 12:44 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Nov 26, 2014 at 12:44 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
S Nov 24, 2014 at 14:14 | history | suggested | Pan Chrono |
added 6 tag
|
|
Nov 24, 2014 at 13:26 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 24, 2014 at 14:14 | |||||
Nov 21, 2014 at 14:55 | comment | added | Scorpid | Are your Contextual filters set right? It sounds as if the contextual filter for the view is set to the taxonomy term name, instead of the tid. | |
Nov 18, 2014 at 16:15 | comment | added | murraybiscuit | Sorry about the necro. I see somebody's put an active bounty on this so I'll take a stab at it. -- To debug, enable the "show the SQL query" option under views/settings. -- Manually enter your path into the Query preview field beneath your view. Can you see the tid being correctly passed to the sql query? -- Check your arguments / contextual filters - are they parsing the right arg? Check your path wildcards /% - are they parsing the path correctly? Use the bundled taxonomy view for reference. | |
Nov 18, 2014 at 12:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDrupal/status/534684504879685632 | ||
Nov 18, 2014 at 11:44 | comment | added | Sumit Madan | There can be one possibility of not working the taxonomy pages that May be something overriding the taxonomy/term/% pages (it can be view) and you may added any vocabularies conditions or something like that. | |
S Nov 18, 2014 at 10:59 | history | bounty started | rockstardev | ||
S Nov 18, 2014 at 10:59 | history | notice added | rockstardev | Draw attention | |
Dec 19, 2012 at 19:16 | comment | added | Colin | They are all published. I am not sure how to tell if they are attached correctly. Each item has a keyword that is part of a vocabulary under taxonomy. | |
Dec 19, 2012 at 18:27 | comment | added | kalabro | Are your content attached to term 17 correctly? Check it twice. Is your content published? | |
Dec 19, 2012 at 16:39 | comment | added | Colin | Thanks, I have tried both of those things without luck for the individual terms. For the /all, the view works fine. | |
Dec 19, 2012 at 16:34 | comment | added | Emil Orol | If you are using Views enable the taxonomy view that ships with views and give it a try. Don't forget cleaning the cache. | |
Dec 19, 2012 at 16:28 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 19, 2012 at 18:17 | |||||
Dec 19, 2012 at 16:08 | history | asked | Colin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |