Skip to main content
added 22 characters in body
Source Link
Free Radical
  • 15.1k
  • 9
  • 48
  • 83

I have created a small test setup in Drupal, containing six nodes with each having a year (integer) and a content (text) field.

The view's configuration is displayed below (sorry for the tinypic links, my reputation is still to low to post images):

http://tinypic.com/r/2zoav4y/5enter image description here

The sort criteria is first on the year field (descending) and then on the content's text (ascending). The view generates the following result:

http://tinypic.com/r/315ir8m/5enter image description here

Note that I have excluded the year field from the display. Instead I'm using the grouping option on year in settings of the unformatted list (however, this is not necessary, but the result resembles your question more closely).

I have created a small test setup in Drupal, containing six nodes with each having a year (integer) and a content (text) field.

The view's configuration is displayed below (sorry for the tinypic links, my reputation is still to low to post images):

http://tinypic.com/r/2zoav4y/5

The sort criteria is first on the year field (descending) and then on the content's text (ascending). The view generates the following result:

http://tinypic.com/r/315ir8m/5

Note that I have excluded the year field from the display. Instead I'm using the grouping option on year in settings of the unformatted list (however, this is not necessary, but the result resembles your question more closely).

I have created a small test setup in Drupal, containing six nodes with each having a year (integer) and a content (text) field.

The view's configuration is displayed below:

enter image description here

The sort criteria is first on the year field (descending) and then on the content's text (ascending). The view generates the following result:

enter image description here

Note that I have excluded the year field from the display. Instead I'm using the grouping option on year in settings of the unformatted list (however, this is not necessary, but the result resembles your question more closely).

fixed grammar
Source Link
Watergate
  • 1.8k
  • 14
  • 15

I have created a small test setup in Drupal, containing six nodes with each having a year (integer) and a content (text) field.

The view's configuration is displayed below (sorry for the tinypic links, my reputation is still to low to post images):

http://tinypic.com/r/2zoav4y/5

The sort criteria is first on the year field (descending) and then on the content's text (ascending). The view generates the following result:

http://tinypic.com/r/315ir8m/5

Note that I have excluded the year field from the display. Instead I'm using the grouping option on year in settings of the unformatted list (however, this is not necessary. But, but the result resembles more closely your question more closely).

I have created a small test setup in Drupal, containing six nodes with each having a year (integer) and a content (text) field.

The view's configuration is displayed below (sorry for the tinypic links, my reputation is still to low to post images):

http://tinypic.com/r/2zoav4y/5

The sort criteria is first on the year field (descending) and then on the content's text (ascending). The view generates the following result:

http://tinypic.com/r/315ir8m/5

Note that I have excluded the year field from the display. Instead I'm using the grouping option on year in settings of the unformatted list (however, this is not necessary. But result resembles more closely your question).

I have created a small test setup in Drupal, containing six nodes with each having a year (integer) and a content (text) field.

The view's configuration is displayed below (sorry for the tinypic links, my reputation is still to low to post images):

http://tinypic.com/r/2zoav4y/5

The sort criteria is first on the year field (descending) and then on the content's text (ascending). The view generates the following result:

http://tinypic.com/r/315ir8m/5

Note that I have excluded the year field from the display. Instead I'm using the grouping option on year in settings of the unformatted list (however, this is not necessary, but the result resembles your question more closely).

Source Link
Watergate
  • 1.8k
  • 14
  • 15

I have created a small test setup in Drupal, containing six nodes with each having a year (integer) and a content (text) field.

The view's configuration is displayed below (sorry for the tinypic links, my reputation is still to low to post images):

http://tinypic.com/r/2zoav4y/5

The sort criteria is first on the year field (descending) and then on the content's text (ascending). The view generates the following result:

http://tinypic.com/r/315ir8m/5

Note that I have excluded the year field from the display. Instead I'm using the grouping option on year in settings of the unformatted list (however, this is not necessary. But result resembles more closely your question).