Timeline for How can I get a relation by the endpoints using the "Fetch entity by property" action in rules?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2014 at 18:19 | answer | added | miro marchi | timeline score: 1 | |
| S May 27, 2013 at 16:17 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 27, 2013 at 16:17 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| May 23, 2013 at 14:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDrupal/status/337570519937318912 | ||
| May 23, 2013 at 13:11 | history | edited | Clive♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed pseudo-tag from title
|
| May 23, 2013 at 12:37 | history | edited | Patrick Kenny | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 427 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 22, 2013 at 1:53 | comment | added | Patrick Kenny | @Bisonbleu Thanks for the idea, but in this case, I am setting the type of all variables upon declaration and fetching entities by property, so as I understand it Rules must know what types are being used. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 1:46 | comment | added | Bisonbleu | Just a humble thought - a shot in the dark really. In some cases, in order to work with a particular field (e.g. a noderef attached to an article) we have to tell Rules that this field exists (adding a condition: entity has field...|| node is of type article). I'm just wandering then if the errors perhaps stem from a missing object? Got this idea while watching this screencast nodeone.se/sv/node/754 | |
| S May 19, 2013 at 15:11 | history | bounty started | Patrick Kenny | ||
| S May 19, 2013 at 15:11 | history | notice added | Patrick Kenny | Draw attention | |
| May 19, 2013 at 15:10 | history | edited | Patrick Kenny | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2013 at 13:45 | history | edited | Patrick Kenny | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 190 characters in body
|
| May 15, 2013 at 12:08 | history | asked | Patrick Kenny | CC BY-SA 3.0 |