There is at least one other question dealing with this, but I found no satisfactory explanation, let alone a solution.

My site used to deliver 800x600 native images hosted externally that were scaled by the browser and CSS. To improve the Google Page Speed, my client asked me to ingest and serve the images on the Drupal site and to size them on the server. So far, so good.

Now I am noticing a big degradation in quality - not good for a real estate site:

Comparison of Imagemagick scaling and Chrome browser scaling

(this is slightly enlarged to better show the issue)

On the right is the old site with scaling/cropping done by Chrome from 800x600 down to 315x208, left is the new site with an image style using imagemagick set to 100% quality, doing the same size reduction and cropping. I tried the "resize" filter but that has the same issue and does not give me the desired results.

The images are not from a stale cache, the image field max size is 800x600, and the file on the server is unaltered and has the original size. It is definitely the image style filter that is causing this.

Previous recommendations were to increase the quality setting for the image toolkit (admin/config/media/image-toolkit), switch to imagemagick, and ensure that the max resolution of the image field does not cause scaling. I have done all that and don't see any improvement.

Any other suggestions?

  • down to 315x208 then why does the image on your question have a height of 594? I don't get it.
    – No Sssweat
    Jan 11, 2017 at 6:56
  • Sssweat because I enlarged it and only show a small section of the original image, to emphasize the degradation (I noted this in the question).
    – cdonner
    Jan 11, 2017 at 19:33

1 Answer 1


I was wrong about not pulling from a stale cache. Credit goes to Jeff who does not want it:

Changing a filter does not mean the image toolkit renders the image again. This only happens once the /files/styles folder is cleared out. Once I did this, the quality improved and I don't see a difference between old and new anymore.

enter image description here

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.